then QCI-P1, Independent Assessment
Open PDFQCI-QS1
Quantum Readiness and Post-Quantum Cryptography Governance Standard
The authoritative framework for quantum-related cryptographic risk governance, inventory, scoring, and board reporting. Free to download, cite, and adopt.
QCI-QS1 v2.3 · Active · Effective September 23, 2026
Questions about applying the standard? Read the governance FAQ.
Standards Index
Current publication status of all QCI governance standards and supplements.
| Document | Version | Status | Last Updated | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Core Standard & Companions | ||||
QCI-QS1 Quantum Readiness and Post-Quantum Cryptography Governance Standard v2.3 · Active · September 23, 2026 PDF | v2.3 | Active | September 23, 2026 | |
QCI-QS1 v2.2 Superseded, retained for edition transition under QCI-1.3-01 v2.2 · Superseded · June 8, 2026 PDF | v2.2 | Superseded | June 8, 2026 | |
QCI Practitioner Handbook Practitioner Handbook: Calibration, Agility Test and Establishment Sequence V2.3 · Active · September 23, 2026 PDF | V2.3 | Active | September 23, 2026 | |
| Sector Supplements (US) | ||||
| v1.2 | Active | September 23, 2026 | ||
| v1.2 | Active | September 23, 2026 | ||
| v1.2 | Active | September 23, 2026 | ||
| v1.2 | Active | September 23, 2026 | ||
| v1.2 | Active | September 23, 2026 | ||
| Regional Supplements (EU) | ||||
| v1.2 | Active | September 23, 2026 | ||
| v1.2 | Active | September 23, 2026 | ||
| v1.1 | Active | September 23, 2026 | ||
| Position Notes | ||||
| v1.1 | Active | September 23, 2026 | ||
| Methods & Assessment | ||||
QCI-M1 Migration Governance Method: Governing post-quantum migration across every cryptographic domain v1.0 · Active · September 23, 2026 PDF | v1.0 | Active | September 23, 2026 | |
QCI-P1 Independent Assessment under QCI-QS1: What an independently assessed result means v1.0 · Active · September 23, 2026 PDF | v1.0 | Active | September 23, 2026 | |
QCI-R1 Post-Quantum Capability Register: Specification, inclusion criteria and listing format v1.0 · Active · September 23, 2026 PDF | v1.0 | Active | September 23, 2026 | |
| Instruments | ||||
| v1.0 | Active | September 23, 2026 | ||
| v1.0 | Active | September 23, 2026 | ||
| v1.0 | Active | September 23, 2026 | ||
| v1.0 | Active | September 23, 2026 | ||
| Companion Handouts Handouts list options by cryptographic domain without ranking them. Inclusion is not endorsement and conformance depends on no tool or provider. | ||||
| v1.0 | Active | September 23, 2026 | ||
| v1.0 | Active | September 23, 2026 | ||
| v1.0 | Active | September 23, 2026 | ||
| v1.0 | Active | September 23, 2026 | ||
| v1.0 | Active | September 23, 2026 | ||
23 documents, 2.4 MB. No form required.
Start here
One document for your role. The rest can wait.
The 90-day establishment sequence
Open PDFWhat drives migration cost and sequence
Open PDFthen QCI-QS1-C2, Remediation and Migration Providers
Open PDFthen QCI-T1, Discovery Evidence Acceptance Checklist
Open PDFShort answer
QCI-QS1 is the Quantum Core Institute's published standard for governing quantum-related cryptographic risk. Edition 2.3, issued September 23, 2026, sets normative requirements in Clauses 1 to 8 covering cryptographic inventory, supplier dependencies, crypto agility, scoring and board reporting. It produces a Q-Risk Score from five weighted pillars, capped by three evidence gates. QCI authors the standard; it is free to download and cite.
In one sentence: QCI-QS1 is QCI's standard for measuring and governing an organization's quantum cryptographic risk.
Part of QCI-QS1 scoring: pillars and gates in the Knowledge Center
Scope, document structure and conformance terms
Applicable edition. Version 2.3, published and effective September 23, 2026. It supersedes Version 2.2 of June 8, 2026; transition between editions is governed by Clause 1.3. A reference to this edition cites Version 2.3 and its date.
Scope. The standard applies inside an assessment boundary the organization defines and its executive sponsor approves: legal entity or business unit, locations, environments, systems, services, critical data flows, supplier dependencies and the assessment period (QCI-1.1-01). Exclusions must be documented, and a critical dependency cannot be excluded solely because evidence or supplier access is unavailable (QCI-1.1-02).
Document structure. Clauses 1 to 8 are normative: scope and conformance, references, terms, governance, inventory, scoring, third-party oversight and governing-body reporting. Clause 9 and Annexes A to G are informative. Companion publications such as the Practitioner Handbook, sector supplements and the QCI-M1 method apply the standard; QCI-M1 states that it does not create requirements and that the standard governs where they differ.
Conformance vocabulary.
- Conformance record: a record for every requirement ID stating applicability, evidence, assessor, date and result (QCI-1.2-01).
- Conformance claim: allowed only when every applicable requirement is met. An accepted risk or approved exception does not convert an unmet requirement, and this edition permits no qualified claim (QCI-1.2-02).
- Assessed against: an organization with open nonconformities may say it was assessed against the standard if it discloses them and does not call the result conformity (QCI-1.2-02).
- Self-assessment or independent assessment: every claim must state which (QCI-1.2-03).
- Not certification: use of the standard is not QCI certification unless separately authorized by an established QCI certification scheme (QCI-1.2-03).
- Score is separate: conformance status is reported separately from the Q-Risk Score (QCI-1.2-04).
For pillar and gate explanations, see the QCI-QS1 section of the Knowledge Center.
Executive Summary
Quantum computers will break the cryptographic infrastructure securing digital identity, financial transactions, and confidential communications. The threat is not theoretical. The timeline is real. Organizations that begin migration planning now will spend months doing it. Organizations that wait will spend years: under pressure, at cost, and under scrutiny.
QCI-QS1 defines what organizations must govern, measure, and report to address this risk. It establishes five integrated components: a governance and accountability framework (QRAF), a crypto dependency inventory standard (QASI), a comparable readiness scoring method (Q-Risk Score), a vendor roadmap request pack for third-party crypto risk, and a governing-body briefing insert for quarterly oversight. Clause 1 governs conformance claims and distinguishes self-assessment from independent assessment.
Version 2.3 fixes a single scoring profile, requires 95 percent validated coverage of both critical systems and critical data flows, removes the exception route through the supplier gate, moves the Defensible readiness band to 81 to 100, and gives every requirement a stable QCI identifier. Scores from earlier editions are not directly comparable without restatement.
This standard is designed to be citeable by auditors, referenced in risk registers, and presented to boards. It is free, complete, and carries no strings. The organizations that adopt it early will be the ones regulators and peers point to when the timeline compresses.
How QCI helps
Independent assessment
An assessed Q-Risk Score under Clause 1, based on the evidence your program holds.
Supplier attestation round
We collect and test critical supplier evidence against G70. Defined scope, 60-day clock.
90-day establishment program
Governance, inventory and board reporting set up to the standard, in sequence.
Ready to Implement the Standard?
Get expert guidance on adopting QCI-QS1, from governance setup to board reporting and sector-specific compliance mapping.